INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY AND SURGERY Shortening the stent length reduces restenosis with bare metal stents: matched pair comparison of short stenting and conventional stenting

نویسندگان

  • U Dietz
  • H Lambertz
چکیده

Objective: To investigate the effect of reducing stent length on the rate of target lesion restenosis. Design: In a prospective investigation, acute and long term results of a short stenting procedure were analysed by quantitative angiography and compared with results of a conventional stenting procedure selected according to a matched pairs analysis. Patients: Short stents were implanted in 400 consecutive patients with 464 lesions and conventional stents in 430 patients. Demographic and lesion characteristics were comparable between groups. Interventions: In short stenting, the shortest stent length to cover only segments with . 30% reduction in vessel diameter was used. In conventional stenting, full coverage of a stenotic vessel segment was intended. Main outcome measures: The mean stent lengths of the short stent group (9.8 (4) mm) and the conventional stent group (16.3 (7) mm) differed significantly (p , 0.0001); all other procedural and angiographic parameters were the same. Procedural success was similar for both groups. Control angiography after six months was conducted in 92% of patients. Results: Short stenting resulted in both less restenosis (68 of 431 (15.8%)) than conventional stenting (93 of 381 (24.4%), p = 0.007) and less late lumen loss (0.6 (0.6) mm v 0.75 (0.5) mm, p = 0.0001). Residual stenosis (, 45%) in adjacent vessel segments after short stenting did not affect the restenosis rate. Only the implantation of a ( 9 mm stent predicted the absence of restenosis in a multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Shortening the length of bare metal stents reduces the restenosis rate as compared with conventional stenting.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Tools & techniques: Percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft lesions.

© Europa Digital & Publishing 2013. All rights reserved. Background The percutaneous treatment of patients with obstructive atherosclerotic disease in coronary saphenous vein bypass grafts (SVG) remains a challenge in interventional cardiology. Patients undergoing SVG intervention are often older, and suffer significant comorbidities. Moreover, SVGs usually present a degenerated pattern of athe...

متن کامل

Evidence for use of coronary stents. A hierarchical bayesian meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND Coronary stents are widely used in interventional cardiology, but a current quantitative systematic overview comparing routine coronary stenting with standard percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and restricted stenting (provisional stenting) has not been published. PURPOSE To summarize results from all randomized clinical trials comparing routine coronary stenting...

متن کامل

No More Debate Over Left Main Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery.

SEE PAGE 318 T raditionally, left main coronary artery disease had been regarded as a dominion of the cardiac surgeons on the basis of results from the classic trial comparing medical treatment and bypass surgery (1,2). However, several brave pioneers in interventional cardiology have continued to evaluate the performance of “less invasive” coronary stenting for the left main coronary artery st...

متن کامل

Perioperative management of the patient with a coronary artery stent.

1093 November 2014 W ITH the advent of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), specifically the bare-metal stent (BMS) and subsequently, the drug-eluting stent (DES), the role of interventional cardiology in coronary revascularization has greatly increased.1 An estimated 600,000 coronary artery stents are placed annually in the United States for the management of acute and chronic coronary ar...

متن کامل

Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison with bare metal stent implantation.

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to compare the clinical and angiographic outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and bare metal stent (BMS) implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis. BACKGROUND The safety and effectiveness of SES implantation for unprotected LMCA stenosis have not been ascertained. METHODS Elective SES implantation for de novo unprotected L...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005